Showing posts with label Aung San Suu Kyi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aung San Suu Kyi. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 15, 2020

Notebook: Protest is Performance And Performance is Protest

Now is the time for protests and performance in both big and small ways. Now is the time sign petitions, make statements, participate in marches, virtue-signal, draft press releases in support of #BlackLivesMatter. I will take all of it, the shallow and the deeply felt, the instagram celebs and the poignant moments of truth. I do not differentiate. History will sort out truth from fiction. But right now, I think we should be encouraging people to act in any way they can because this is all apart of a grand public performance.

 Most protest is performative activism. I love Tonya Pinkins's medium article titled "Why I'm Fed Up with Performative Activism" but some people have taken this idea as a cudgel to bash any metaphorical protests. You're tossing performative around like it's a negative thing. The most effective protests throughout history have been performative metaphors that are theatrical-ized by people. The Boston Tea Party was performative...a bunch of white dudes got dressed up like Native Americans and dumped tea into the harbor. Did the tea dump do vital damage to the British Empire? No. Were the protestors only upset about tea prices? No. Yet, the performance of that small act was a metaphor that galvanized other people. A small group of people perform a metaphor that sticks in the mind's of people...yes it IS like theatre. 

-what you're really talking about is the difference between an effective performance and ineffective performance as protest. So what makes an effective performance? Well first off there is timing and attention...
-Remember National School Walkout? Students across the country participated in anti-gun violence.  In some small towns there was no groundswell of support. But there was one student who walked out for an hour, or one student who stood on the street by themselves. What difference can one student make? Nothing. But it was performative gesture, it was the right time, and it got attention b/c someone took a picture of it. And the images of those individual students was as powerful and poignant as the thousands of people walking out together. Why? Because it struck a heroic note of -even if I am the last person- I'm going to do the right thing. 

Ppl judge situations by 3 factors: 1) is the cause good or bad 2) is the protests active or passive 3) does it come across as strong or weak? Gandhi's 1930 Salt March was to protest British law forbidding Indians from making their own salt. He was going to take a long walk to the ocean and then make salt from the water. Salt is a pure and clean image in people's mind. It comes from the earth, it is a natural thing. The salt march takes something seemingly mundane and charges it with political and spiritual meaning. A walk becomes 1) virtuous 2) strong 3) active in opposing the British Crown. His adversaries look evil and foolish because they're stopping a kindly old man from taking a walk and  making salt out of ocean water.  MLK repeated this strategy in Selma. He took a walk across a bridge. Like Gandhi he had the perfect visual metaphor: an actual bridge both black and white people were going to cross. The performative metaphor and its context allowed the protestors to do the right thing, be strong, and be active by taking a walk, praying, walking some more. The evil of segregation would be highlighted by King walking across a bridge. Did he need to literally walk across that bridge to get somewhere? No. It's not like his house was on the other side. But did we -as a nation- need him to walk across that bridge so that WE could get somewhere? Absolutely. 

-AIDS Quilt is performative, ACT UP's 'die-in's are performative and theatrical. Later on, #BLM repeated the same tactic by laying their bodies on the ground and pretending to be dead. 

- Tiananmen Square tank guy is performative. We all know the tank could've crushed him or a soldier could have walked out and arrested him and dragged him away. The performance was a game of chicken: I dare you to show how brutal you are to your citizens in secret prisons...but in public.

-This is why theatre ppl love protests. Yes we are a vain and narcissistic bunch, but we're also looking for the metaphors in our lives that take mundane things and charge them with meaning. 

- So what good does a performative statement do from a corporation during this crisis? It serves as a record. It is an apology and a promissory note. Generally  most people think 'out of sight, out of mind' but that promise to do better doesn't die. Like the truth, it travels underground and builds and grows. Wickedness thrives in silence and off-the-record. That's why Black people are all about records. Our entrance into this country was as a matter of trade records. We keep lists and notes and details. Like Nina Simone's "Pirate Jenny" there is a day of reckoning. There is a time when the bill must be paid and we have all the receipts. So get your company, your theatre, your boss, your local org to make those #BLM statements. Get them on record because they're going to forget. But all that is forgotten is not lost. The bill must be paid. 

-Virtue Police: The idea that there's some pure virtuous cause unblemished by human vanity and selfishness is bullshit. Every cause is tainted with 'me' because I bring me along to every action. There is a honeymoon period where you can attract idealists and get them to do a few good deeds. But every movement that lasts for the long haul has self-interests. The question is how do we take your self-interests, my self-interests, their self-interests...put it in a pot and melt it down to some thing that can be achieved.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

NO PEACE, NO JUSTICE


The protest call is 'NO JUSTICE, NO PEACE' All around the world people chant this simple battle cry.

Give me justice! I demand justice! And if I do not get justice, I will not be peaceful. 

To barter justice for peace, implies that one must come before the other. That the victimized, abused and accursed will no longer be peaceful until they are given what is owed to them. The chant underlies a belief that justice is in the hands of those 'others' out there. These 'others' are more powerful and must be called to task with the threat of unrest.

Trayvon Martin is the latest in the line of tragedies in which we demand justice or there will not be peace.

Today while skimming through the headlines it suddenly struck me that it should be the other way around.

NO PEACE, NO JUSTICE

There will always be injustice as long as there's a lack of peace. But while the former calls for others to do something, the revised call demands my hand in creating peace. No justice, no peace is a battle cry shouted for cameras. No peace, no justice is a heart mantra to be repeated softly throughout a day when facing any conflict.

If I could remember that all the justice I seek comes out of peace, then it would be very hard to get angry. The goal shifts and I must find the peace. There is only one place to look for this peace.

Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King were peace activists. Their marches stirred the disharmony present in the system and brought it to the surface in all its ugliness. Once in the light, the disharmony could not continue in its hidden state. It had to change because Gandhi and King were coming from a God-centered consciousness. This is a state of being that is the pure non-duality of love. It doesn't demand, differentiate, or hint. It offers love and peace that extends out to all who are willing to accept it.

The difference between peace marches and 'no justice, no peace' movements couldn't be any clearer. Peace marches employ God-centered consciousness, which removes the systematic injustice. 'No justice, no peace' marches seek to fight anger with anger.

Last year's Occupy Wall Street movement was an example of a successful group awakening that could not organically sustain itself. The marchers were mostly peaceful, they had not specific demands, and they merely wished to highlight the issues. But OWS could not succeed in the long-run. There was no God consciousness. Bereft of love, all social movements turn to hatred and accusation. There has never been an exception in human history to this rule.



In Myanmar there was an election this week for the first time in decades. Nobel Peace Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi has carried the message of peace into the heart of a brutal dictatorship. When she was urged to raise up a rebel army, she sat and prayed. When the military junta put her under house arrest, she sat and prayed. When her followers demanded that things go quicker, faster, that justice appear at their beckon call she merely shrugged her shoulders. The timing of peace wasn't up to her. Her job was to just surrender to it and allow. Allow for peace. Create the space of love. They fought her, killed thousands, censored her voice, but they could not stop this God-centered consciousness. It flowed out effortlessly and shifted the axis of global debate. This love shined a light on the injustice that was so bright that countries with no immediate interests or dealings with Myanmar began speaking up on the people's behalf.

Justice and peace go hand-in-hand. One does not precede the other. They move in-sync with each other. It is my impatience that sees the error in other's hearts before I check the one in my own.

PEACE>>>JUSTICE<<<<PEACE

Get What You Want: June 2026

  GET WHAT YOU WANT June / July 2026 32 Opportunities  ·  Residencies  ·  Fellowships  ·  Grants  ·  Prizes  ·  Competitions  ·  Internation...