It moves beneath the world, the characters, and the words. When audiences have a creeping sensation of dread, fear, fate, motherhood, love, or a premonition of an explosion...it's moving. Subtext lives in the shadows and caves. It's implied, hinting at, or it's the elephant in the room that people are avoiding talking about..so that everyone is always thinking about it. There are 3 types of subtexts: what characters say, what characters do, and where characters live (words, actions, setting.)
A script can have brilliant subtext in its setting and wooden subtext in its dialogue. Or a character can speak with perfect subtext while their actions are screaming what their mouth refuses to say. The best work runs all three simultaneously. When that happens, the audience doesn't just hear the story. They feel it pressing in from every direction.
SUBTEXT IN DIALOGUE
Three types of character subtext when it comes to what they won't say.
1. A character who WON'T say something is making a choice. They know exactly what they're withholding. Roy Cohn in ANGELS IN AMERICA knows he's gay, knows he's dying of AIDS, and refuses to say either thing out loud because saying it makes it real and real things can kill you. Every scene he's in runs on the pressure of what he's not saying.
2. A character who CAN'T say something doesn't have the language or the emotional access to name what's happening. The love comes out as control, or anger, or instructions. Think of Troy Maxson in FENCES. He loves Cory. The audience hears it. Troy can't find it. That gap between what he means and what comes out is the whole play.
3. A character who DOESN'T KNOW they're not saying it is the richest situation of the three, because now the audience is ahead of the character. Willy Loman insists he's well-liked while the evidence of failure piles up around him. He's not lying. He genuinely doesn't know. The audience watching him not know is the engine of DEATH OF A SALESMAN.
Know which one you're writing before you write the scene. The diagnosis changes everything about how you write the lines.
SUBTEXT IN ACTION
This is where most writers lose the most ground. They write the subtext correctly in the dialogue and then stage it literally. The character talks about grief and then weeps. The character talks about rage and then slams a door. The body is just illustrating what the mouth already said. That's not subtext. That's redundancy.
Subtext in action is when a character's physical behavior says the thing their words are refusing to say. Not illustrates. Says.
The test for subtext in action: cover the dialogue and watch what the character is doing. Does the physical behavior tell its own story? If the character is just illustrating the lines, the action has no subtext. If the character is contradicting the lines, or doing something the lines would never say, the action is working.
Three questions to ask of every significant physical action:
1. What does the character think they're doing?
2. What are they actually doing?
3. And what are they refusing to do, which is why they're doing this instead?
Troy Maxson builds a fence. He never explains why. He explains the fence constantly, but never the real reason. Every theory he offers is wrong: it's not to keep Cory in, not to keep death out, not to protect the yard. It's because a man who cannot say "I love my family and I am terrified of losing them" can pick up a hammer and swing it. The fence is his love. His fear. His failure. All of it happening in the body while the mouth argues about lumber.
Floyd in SEVEN GUITARS pawns his guitar. Floyd will tell you it's practical. He needs the money to get to Chicago. But what Floyd is actually doing is surrendering the one thing he owns that makes him real in the world. Which is exactly what a man does when he's decided, without consciously deciding, to take the bet that might kill him. The guitar goes into the pawnshop and comes out again. Then Hedley severs his windpipe. Wilson knew. The guitar was the tell.
Hedley kills the rooster. No explanation required. The entire audience feels what that means for a man who says he's going to be a big man someday. He kills the one thing on the property that crowed every morning to announce that another day had come.
Willy Loman tries to plant seeds in the dark. At midnight, in a garden that won't grow anything, he's on his hands and knees with a flashlight trying to get something to take root. He's not gardening. He's having a conversation with his own failure that he can't have any other way. The seeds won't grow and he knows it and he plants them anyway. That's the most precise stage direction in American drama.
In A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE, Blanche bathes constantly. Long, elaborate baths at inconvenient times. She says it's to calm her nerves. What she's actually doing is trying to wash off what she did in Laurel, which no amount of water is going to touch. The more she bathes, the more the audience understands she knows it won't work. Stanley doesn't need to expose her. She's been confessing with her body since Scene One.
Floyd thinks he's being practical about the guitar. He's actually surrendering. He's refusing to ask Vera directly if she'll come with him to Chicago. So he pawns the guitar and talks about Chicago instead. The gap between those three answers is where the subtext lives.
Objects as subtext. Objects in plays take on the emotional weight characters refuse to carry in their bodies or their words. The fence. The guitar. The piano in THE PIANO LESSON. Laura's glass unicorn in THE GLASS MENAGERIE. Hedda Gabler's pistols. Mama Younger's plant in A RAISIN IN THE SUN.
These aren't symbols decorated with meaning by a writer at a desk. They are substitutes. They are what the character loves or fears or cannot let go of, made physical so the actor has something to do with their hands while the mouth says something else entirely.
Laura's glass unicorn is the clearest example. It's the only one in the collection without a horn, which makes it less unusual, which means it fits in with ordinary horses, which means Laura secretly hopes she could too. She never says any of that. She holds the animal and talks about her glass collection and you know everything. When Jim accidentally breaks the horn and it becomes a regular horse, and she gives it to him as a gift, she's giving him the broken version of herself and calling it a keepsake. The object does in thirty seconds what a monologue couldn't do in three pages.
An object earns its subtext when the character's relationship to it changes across the play. Track that change and you're tracking the character's interior life without requiring them to explain it.
SUBTEXT IN SETTING
The world of the play is not a backdrop. It is a character. More specifically: the setting is the antagonist's argument made physical. Whatever the play's thematic question is, the setting is the world's answer, usually a hostile one.
Three questions to ask of any setting:
1. What is this world's argument?
2. What has the world already decided about the characters before they walk into it?
3. And what will the physical world do by the end of the play that the characters couldn't do themselves?
If the setting doesn't have answers to those three questions, it's a backdrop. If it does, it's a co-author.
Troy Maxson's backyard has a ten-foot fence on one side and a four-foot fence on the other, and it faces the alley and not the street. That's not neutral description. That's a man's life summarized in a stage direction. He's hemmed in, partially hidden from public view, accessible from the back rather than the front. And he's building another fence on top of it. The setting argues: this man has been contained and is now containing himself.
The boardinghouse in JOE TURNER'S COME AND GONE is a crossroads. 1911 Pittsburgh, a house full of transients, everyone passing through on the way to somewhere else in the Great Migration. Wilson didn't choose that setting for atmosphere. The setting is the thematic argument: these are people in transit between who slavery made them and who they're trying to become, and this house is the liminal space between those two identities. When Herald Loomis finds his song in that boardinghouse, he finds it in exactly the right place. A nowhere that is also an everywhere.
The Wingfield apartment in THE GLASS MENAGERIE is in a St. Louis alley. No yard. Fire escapes instead of windows. Tom describes it as a hive with a fundamentally enclosed quality. The word he uses is 'fundamentally.' Wilson would've been proud of that. The setting argues that the Wingfields have been structurally excluded from the open life and are now managing the enclosure by making it precious, filling it with music and glass animals and old movies. When Tom finally escapes, he steps out onto the fire escape, which was also a way out for the whole play and nobody took it until he couldn't stand it anymore.
The Overlook Hotel in THE SHINING. Stanley Kubrick builds a hotel where the geography is physically impossible, corridors that lead nowhere, windows in rooms that can't have windows, a hedge maze that the building seems to swallow. The setting is doing the thematic argument before Jack Torrance ever picks up an axe: this is a space that cannot be rationally understood, and a man who needs to be the authority on everything he surveys has been placed inside it. The hotel doesn't make him crazy. The hotel reveals what was already there by refusing to make sense.
PUTTING IT TOGETHER
The stories that last are the ones where all three subtext layers are running simultaneously and saying related but not identical things.
In FENCES: Troy can't say he loves his family (dialogue subtext). He builds a fence instead (action subtext). The backyard has been hemming him in since before the play started (setting subtext). Three different statements about the same man's emotional life. None of them identical. All converging on the same ending.
In DEATH OF A SALESMAN: Willy doesn't know he's lying to himself (dialogue subtext). He plants seeds in the dark (action subtext). The house is surrounded by apartment buildings that have closed in on it over the years, blocking out the light that used to grow things there (setting subtext). The world the play takes place in is a physical version of what's happening inside Willy's head. He's been enclosed and he keeps trying to plant.
When all three layers work, you don't explain the play to the audience. The audience explains it to themselves. And they'll carry different versions of the explanation home, depending on which layer hit them hardest. That's not a failure of clarity. That's a play doing its job.
No comments:
Post a Comment